RACI Matrix
Reference model
One row per decision, one letter per person: R does the work, A owns the outcome (exactly one), C is asked before, I is told after.
About this model
For every decision or task, one name is Accountable and owns the outcome; others are Responsible (do the work), Consulted (asked before) or Informed (told after). Writing it down removes the ambiguity about who actually decides — and shows where one person holds too much.
The responsibility assignment matrix (RACI), standard in project management and governance (as in the PMI PMBOK Guide) · Standard practice
How to read it
- List specific decisions or tasks — “approve a price change above 5%”, not “pricing” — and name the people, not only their titles.
- Check each row: exactly one Accountable, and at least one Responsible. Two Accountables, or none, is the finding — not a form to finish.
- Look across the rows: if one person is Accountable for most decisions, the chart has found a bottleneck, not an owner.
What this does
Assigns Responsible, Accountable, Consulted, and Informed for every key decision — removes ambiguity about who actually decides.
When to use it
Whenever a 7S review surfaces unclear ownership.
Not when: A team of two or three where everyone already knows who decides what — the overhead of a formal matrix outweighs the ambiguity it would remove.
What happens next
Clarified ownership feeds Functional Strategy execution (L7) directly.
Golden thread
Builds on ←
- sevens
Feeds into →
- stp
Framework library: Organisation (layer L5), lifecycle stages 2 to 5.
Use this tool, free
Sign in to open the worksheet. Your work saves as you type, the AI can draft the parts you have not filled in, and you finish with an analysis and a 30/60/90-day action plan.
Hand-built by Eccellere and reviewed by Eccellere on 02/11/2026. Guidance, not advice: apply your own judgement.