Scenario Planning (Shell-style)
Reference model
The two critical uncertainties form the axes; each corner is a different, internally consistent future.
About this model
Instead of one forecast, builds a few distinct, plausible futures around the two uncertainties that matter most and are least predictable — so the strategy holds up across more than one version of what happens next.
Pierre Wack at Royal Dutch Shell (1970s), developed by Peter Schwartz — The Art of the Long View · 1970s–1991
How to read it
- Start from one focal question, list the forces that will shape the answer, then separate what is already certain from what is truly uncertain.
- Pick the two uncertainties that have the biggest impact and are hardest to predict. Their two ends form the axes, and the four corners are the four scenarios.
- Scenarios are not forecasts or best/worst cases: each must be plausible and tell a coherent story. Look for moves that work in all four, and signposts that tell you which one is unfolding.
What this does
Builds a small set of plausible, distinct futures — not a single forecast — so the strategy is robust across more than one version of what happens next.
When to use it
Growth through Renewal, under real uncertainty (input-cost shocks, new regulation, a new entrant) where a single forecast would be false precision.
What happens next
Stress-tests the Financial Model's assumptions and Risk Heat Map likelihood ratings.
Golden thread
Builds on ←
A starting point: it needs no earlier tool.
Feeds into →
- financial
Framework library: Strategy and environment (layer L1), lifecycle stages 3 to 6.
Use this tool, free
Sign in to open the worksheet. Your work saves as you type, the AI can draft the parts you have not filled in, and you finish with an analysis and a 30/60/90-day action plan.
Hand-built by Eccellere and reviewed by Eccellere on 02/11/2026. Guidance, not advice: apply your own judgement.